Wednesday, December 1, 2010

Tally 7.2 Memory Access Voilation

Pannella and Radicals woo Berlusconi? It p. ..

NOIRPINK: Pannella and the Radicals woo Berlusconi? We spoke with Frank Poira (Radicals Milan) :

The proposal for dialogue by Marco Pannella to Silvio Berlusconi has outraged many militants shaky center-left, some people are disappointed, angry black who is, who is completely baffled . Pannella woos Berlusconi, the radicals are ready to sell out to the PDL, talk about party politics and then do the reversals, the power has given them the head ...: If there are those of all colors, very few, however, tried to figure it out by asking them to explain their own, these "strange creatures" called radicals.

We do this so we today, with some questions and no turn of phrase, meeting Poiré Francis, secretary of the Radical Enzo Tortora di Milano and member of the National Committee of the Italian Radicals.

*

Pannella seems to flirt with Berlusconi after the Radicals have become elected to Parliament with the PD. What is so attractive in Berlusconi and his allies in the clerical or racist? In many understand and share concerns regarding this center-left, but end up saving Silvio is not too much?

Pannella did not say who will save but Berlusconi said that the Radicals have always been and always will be ready to dialogue with anyone who recognizes the political identity.
Since June, the PD has undermined the reform that allowed prisoners to serve under house arrest last year of the sentence, giving the Italian prisons and making a new face might fall within the law, the deputies and senators are radical autosospesi PD group, in the silence and indifference of general newspapers and activists of the center. Despite being asked for a meeting in June at the top of the Democratic Party has no one ever responded. This output is
finally served notice to the Radicals that currently exist and, despite having been elected from the lists of PD, for the past six months have more relationships with those who had them elected, and not our will. This does not mean support the Berlusconi government.
The newspapers are wasted on the promises that the PDL for the Radicals would not invite them to vote no confidence in the Chamber of Deputies, from gay marriage to the reform of justice. If it were really so I would not see anything wrong to support such a government program that even a center-left government has been able to do. But I do not think this is the case.
I think the confidence will be voted on and then we will have in front of two roads, both with many ombre: il voto, con una spesa di 8 miliardi di euro che le nostre casse non hanno, con nuovo rifinanziamento pubblico ai partiti, con la pensione dei deputati già maturata... insomma un grandissimo regalo alla partitocrazia che darà lo stesso risultato elettorale di oggi. Oppure un governo tecnico, con l’UDC in appoggio al centrodestra, così da poter schiacciare ulteriormente le libertà personali con una maggioranza più ampia.

E allora come si potrebbe uscire da questo quadro politico grottescamente incasinato?

Nuove elezioni non cambierebbero il panorama politico attuale e sarebbero un costo troppo oneroso in un momento in cui vengono chiesti sforzi a tutti i cittadini. Un costo inutile per a new parliament to be appointed. For this reason we support the call for the single-member constituency and urge urgent institutional reforms. In these conditions, the elections could be held only in an atmosphere of lawlessness, without producing any appreciable result.

Emma Bonino like a lot, Marco Pannella a few. The Radicals are often described as hostages of the historic leaders and many think that if there was movement under the command of Emma, \u200b\u200bthe percentage of votes for the Radicals spikes, ...

do not think the change of leadership could change the result very radical in the elections, there is evidence that the appearance of the panels a few days before the vote at the European rather than raddoppiato le intenzioni di voto e i voti alla Lista. Il problema dei Radicali è la visibilità, soprattutto quella mediatica, che il regime tende ad eliminare perché cosciente che tutte le volte che ci viene dato spazio i nostri consensi aumentano perché affrontiamo temi che interessano tutti i cittadini.

Cosa rappresenta Pannella per il movimento radicale e, più in generale, per la storia italiana?

La figura di Pannella è fondamentale e determinante per la vita politica italiana ma soprattutto per le riforme che hanno un forte impatto sulla società. Dopo la vittoria con il referendum sul divorzio qualunque leader si sarebbe adagiato sugli allori invece Pannella ha rilanciato con l’idea the new referendum on abortion illegal to harm, and often killed many women who could not afford adequate care and were entrusted to the midwives.
's life is always in the foreground, a life full of memories and political life still to live for aficionados of the Radicals and Radical Radio is the weekly voice in the conversation on Sunday where Mark explores the issues of current political stuff with anecdotes and memories of his life and all the great personalities who created and gave voice to the Radical Party, from Pasolini to Sciascia, from Adelaide Aglietta Enzo Tortora, from drums to Anthony Russo, the Dalai Lama to John Paul II.

The Radicals are accused useless utopianism, of mythomania, of real madness would revolutionize the country when they can not collect enough votes to pass the electoral threshold. How realistic is in your proposals? And it would be better, as some suggest, dissolve the party and to bring forward radical demands, to stand for election as a candidate in the other configurations?

This solution has already been applied a few years ago, with the demand of the Radicals in the hospitality of the other parties, and would not be a problem to repeat: today there are some radicals' everywhere. To win a campaign, though, there should be elezioni democratiche e noi negli anni abbiamo collezionato sentenze e pronunce dell’AGCom sulla nostra esclusione dai media, provata dai dati del Centro di ascolto. La legge impone la par condicio, ma la realtà è molto diversa: il regime scrive le regole, ma poi disapplica le leggi che lui stesso si è dato, con buona pace dello stato di diritto.

0 comments:

Post a Comment